Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 08, 2010, 02:09:30 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: BACK TO DECEPTION BYTES MAIN SITE

Deception Bytes
+  DeceptionBytes
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  Tongues
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Tongues  (Read 1522 times)
JP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 161


View Profile
« on: February 07, 2010, 05:59:48 PM »

I'm sure tongues have probably been discussed on the forum before, but I couldn't find it upon searching.  I just wanted some thoughts and feedback from some of you.  I have never spoken in tongues, nor do I feel I fully understand it.  I read in Scripture that it says "do not forbid speaking in tongues".  I read that it is one of the gifts.  I read that if someone speaks in tongues during worship, there is to be an interpreter.  But anyway, here is what is happening at our church (a church we just joined a couple of weeks ago) - There are a couple of people who pray in tongues.  They do not pray out loud, they are praying softly in tongues while someone else may be praying out loud and you can only hear them if you are sitting right next to them.  Well, now there are some who are up in arms over this and are having meetings with the Pastor (who has only been there for 6 months).  These people love the Lord.  The pastor preaches Jesus and him crucified and His resurrection power.  He preaches repentance.  I have not heard anything that is not Biblical.  Should they be asked to refrain from speaking in tongues because it seems to be a stumbling block for others or should the others be told to get over it (in love, of course)?
Logged

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable - if anything is excellent or praiseworthy - think about such things.
iwanthetruth
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 237



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2010, 09:17:32 PM »

We are taught in scripture not to be a stumbling block to others. So if what these people are doing is a stumbling block, then they need to have the same  attittude as Christ as spoken about in Phillipians 2 and stop while in a corporate setting.

IMHO, if they are speakig loud enough for others to hear then it is no different than speaking out loud and needs to be interpreted. If no one is able to interpret then they need to keep quiet. Also if they are praying under their breath then how can they be listening to the pastors prayer and be in agreement with him?

Did you know that in 1 Corinthian 12 when it says in verse 1...now concerning spiritual gifts..." that in some translations the word "gift" is replaced with "people". So the verse is rendered... now concerning spiritual people.... Interesting, and the word "tongues" is translated in some versions as "foreign language". So, of course that can bring up a whole can of worms and then you get in the whole debate of whether tongues is being properly used. Same with prophecy... in some versions the translation is "infallible preaching". 

So the real question will be, where does the denomination fall with this issue and where will the pastor stand?
Logged

Tim
Bless the Lord all my Soul and all that is within me, bless His Holy Name!
deagah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 235



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2010, 11:18:43 PM »

The tongues spoken in the NT was a real language. The thing that passes for  tongues today is jibberish. I'm sure the people at your Church are sincere God loving people but they're following error that goes back to Azuza street.
Logged
JP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 161


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2010, 06:07:21 AM »

Thanks for the input.  I am feeling the same way.  It would be better to refrain from speaking in tongues than to let it cause disunity and affect the body of Christ.  My other thought is this - Doesn't Paul say that tongues edifies one's self?  If that is the case, where should you be edifying yourself?  In church or at home in your private time with God?  I'm trying real hard not to jump to judgement because I do see a sincere love for the Lord in these individuals.  And the thing that bothers me on the other side of this is that the ones that are up in arms over "tongues" do not even come and participate in the prayer meetings.  They just heard about it and don't want it going on.
Logged

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable - if anything is excellent or praiseworthy - think about such things.
jillybean
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 222



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2010, 06:28:56 AM »

Correct me if I am wrong, as I understand it from the Bible the speaking in tounges was so all the people could understand and be amazed that they were able to hear them speaking in their original language.
Logged
JP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 161


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2010, 07:42:02 AM »

Correct me if I am wrong, as I understand it from the Bible the speaking in tounges was so all the people could understand and be amazed that they were able to hear them speaking in their original language.

At Pentecost - yes.  However there are other scriptures that speak about tongues, for instance, in Acts chapter 10 we have Cornelius and Peter.  Each receive a vision.  Peter goes to Cornelius' house and preaches.   It appears they have conversation and that they understand Peter as he begins preaching.  Then in verse 44 it says "While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message"  verse 46 "For they heard them speaking in tongues and praise God".
Why would tongues be needed in this instance?  Just as a manifestation of the Holy Spirit?
Logged

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable - if anything is excellent or praiseworthy - think about such things.
JP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 161


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2010, 07:47:04 AM »

Some other scriptures that I am trying to sort out and understand are these -

In 1Cor 14:39 Paul says "do not forbid speaking in tongues"  He also says that tongues are a sign for unbelievers.  Tongues is listed with the other gifts of the Spirit, but Paul also refers to tongues of angels in 1Cor 13:1 and in Mark 16:17 it states that one of the signs that will accompany those who believe would be "they will speak in new tongues".

So is there "tongues" that are a gift given to those who would speak them in church for the benefit of unbelievers and then is there "tongues" that will accompany those who believe that is a prayer language as some claim?
Logged

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable - if anything is excellent or praiseworthy - think about such things.
deagah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 235



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2010, 12:23:12 PM »

Thanks for the input.  I am feeling the same way.  It would be better to refrain from speaking in tongues than to let it cause disunity and affect the body of Christ.  My other thought is this - Doesn't Paul say that tongues edifies one's self?  If that is the case, where should you be edifying yourself?  In church or at home in your private time with God?  I'm trying real hard not to jump to judgement because I do see a sincere love for the Lord in these individuals.  And the thing that bothers me on the other side of this is that the ones that are up in arms over "tongues" do not even come and participate in the prayer meetings.  They just heard about it and don't want it going on.
Tongues as a form of prayer language has evolved over the years (error is always on a downward spiral). Of all the scriptures dealing with prayer and Jesus Himself teaching too (Mat. 6:9-13), no where do we find the prayer language. We can be certain the Holy Spirit would have mentioned a private prayer language if there really was one. If there is no prayer language then there is no need for tongues at a prayer meeting, other than to sow confusion.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2010, 01:46:22 PM by deagah » Logged
deagah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 235



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2010, 05:15:34 PM »

At Pentecost - yes.  However there are other scriptures that speak about tongues, for instance, in Acts chapter 10 we have Cornelius and Peter.  Each receive a vision.  Peter goes to Cornelius' house and preaches.   It appears they have conversation and that they understand Peter as he begins preaching.  Then in verse 44 it says "While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message"  verse 46 "For they heard them speaking in tongues and praise God".
Why would tongues be needed in this instance?  Just as a manifestation of the Holy Spirit?
There are things we don’t understand about tongues today. What I do know is whatever  was said was objective and understood by everyone and we can be sure of that because of the "law of first mention" which says where a doctrine is introduced you need to study the first time it is in the scriptures to understand its meaning. The first time tongues is mentioned the people understood the words. It wasn’t a subjective interpretation like we see today.
Some other scriptures that I am trying to sort out and understand are these -

In 1Cor 14:39 Paul says "do not forbid speaking in tongues"  He also says that tongues are a sign for unbelievers.  Tongues is listed with the other gifts of the Spirit, but Paul also refers to tongues of angels in 1Cor 13:1 and in Mark 16:17 it states that one of the signs that will accompany those who believe would be "they will speak in new tongues".

So is there "tongues" that are a gift given to those who would speak them in church for the benefit of unbelievers and then is there "tongues" that will accompany those who believe that is a prayer language as some claim?

The tongue back then would have been so people of other languages could understand the gospel.  When Azuza street first began they even knew this and claimed they would go out and preach the gospel to people with out ever having learned their native "tongue". The “unbelievers” Paul is referring to is the Jews (Is 28:11). The point and context of chapter 14 is to show the reader that we need to “understand” the words but this is the polar opposite of what we see in today’s tongue talking.  It may seem small and harmless but I can tell you first hand that I have seen this gift ruin peoples lives. And the people that practiced this were not the exception but the rule.

**I believe Mark 16 is referring to the apostles and I believe the "tongues of angels" is hyperbole because in the next verse Paul mentions having the faith “to move mountains” and I don’t believe we really can move mountains by believing it can be done, though I would wager Kenneth Copeland and those like him would certainly disagree with me about that. One more thing to think about on the angel thing, when we see angels in the scriptures speaking with man and woman they always use objective words as well so if there were a language of angels, God hasn’t told us anything about it which mean we are left to let those within the Charismatic camps define (divine) it to us like they've been these past decades.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2010, 11:37:40 PM by deagah » Logged
HeraldingTruth
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2010, 09:02:24 PM »

Here's an excellent audio from an ex Word of Faith/Signs and Wonders preacher Mark Haville. He explains that there really is no such thing as a "gift" of tongues like we've been told, listen through and you'll understand what he's saying. Click on the link below and then download the file to Itunes to listen.

http://www.mediafire.com/?dzl1tj22uyy
Logged
StevePage
Guest
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2010, 04:30:35 AM »

From Faith in Faith
to Faith in Christ

By: Peter Glover

Mark Haville’s is an extraordinary story. Converted into the Pentecostal/Charismatic church he quickly came under the spell of the Word-Faith teaching of men like Kenneth Copeland. But things did not stay that way for Mark…

Still in his mid-20’s, Mark became an itinerant minister travelling the country earning large sums of money through his ability to perform ’signs and wonders’. Remarkably, he has renounced his former life, his beliefs, and his practices as a Word-Faith minister and is now speaking out boldly against the beliefs and practices of the current Signs and Wonders movement.

(Note: In the text ‘EN’ refers to Evangelicals Now, and ‘MH’ refers to Mark Haville. ‘PG’ is Peter Glover)

EN: “How did you first get involved with Word Faith teaching?”

MH: I was given lots of tapes and books by Kenneth Copeland which everyone was into at my church in North London. I believed that my Christian experience could validate my faith. It convinced me that what I was in was real. I was impressed by the numbers involved, their interest in the media, publications, the money and the general trappings of success – it bred the belief in me that biggest must be best.

EN: “What was the most appealing aspect of Word Faith teaching for you?”

MH: The Word Faith movement offered me power, what I believed to be a convincing testimony to the reality of God. It gave me support because I could show ‘things’ by preaching and performing. I was given numerous videos, audios and literature. All that I was given appeared glossy and successful.

EN: “How did you use what you saw in this material?”

MH: Basically, I copied it. I learned gradually to do what all these speakers like Copeland, Cerullo, Benny Hinn and others do. They manipulate audiences and individuals simply by the power of suggestion. They call the result ’signs and wonders’. They are deluded. Gradually, I too had learned the process of controlling meetings and inducing hypnotic techniques through suggestion in churches. I did many of the so-called signs and wonders.

(PG: I was shown a video of a meeting held at a Pentecostal fellowship in Leeds being run by Mark. He explained the staged process of audience manipulation as things progressed. After a long period of singing what Mark described as ‘relaxing’ Spirit-focused songs, he appeared to be able to blow individuals over at will. They then remained on the ground for long periods – what is commonly termed ’slaying in the spirit’).

THE RIGHT ATMOSPHERE

EN: “You maintain then that you were able to induce an atmosphere that was conducive to hypnotic suggestion?”

MH: Absolutely. The techniques are no different to those used by any practising hypnotist. First, the people in these meetings are already coming with high expectancy – they want it to be God. Second, you need to create the right atmosphere – hence the long periods of singing certain types of songs to make people feel relaxed and warm.

EN: “What kind of praise and worship?”

MH: It is very important to use songs and words that are focused on the Holy Spirit. This creates a far more mystical atmosphere. Songs full of Christian or Biblical doctrine work against people suspending their critical faculties. The effect is to create a mindlessness that will open your audience up to suggestion. Most people have no idea just how powerful suggestion can be. Let me add that all this is not necessarily done wilfully by leaders. This is something many of them have stumbled upon. It works, so they do it and call it “the Holy Spirit”.

EN: “Will it affect everyone at the meeting?”

MH: No, not at all. If you do not believe that it is God that is doing these things in the meeting, there is no way you will fall down. But remember, I am the one running the show. Just like any good hypnotist, I will be ‘working’ the audience. I can tell which ones are the more suggestive by asking certain questions. I can then bring people forward, having gotten them into a very relaxed and accepting state. You have to remember, people who come really want to believe that God is at work. By telling them to stand in a particular place I am strongly influencing their belief that by standing where I have told them – on that exact spot – something is going to happen. By telling them someone will stand behind them, because we wouldn’t want them to get hurt if they fall, it is all heightening the sense of anticipation and suggestiveness. The rest is easy.

EN: “You seemed to find it difficult to watch yourself on screen.”

MH: Yes, I find it very hard knowing how I unconsciously deceived good people into believing that the Holy Spirit was at work when it was common or garden hypnosis. But at the time I suppose I did believe, however incorrectly, that these things were the activity of God. But the reality is, I learned these techniques by watching others, and anybody can do them given enough training. They are psychological techniques – nothing else.

EN: “What caused you to look again at what you were doing and believed?”

MH: In a nutshell – the Scriptures themselves. I decided that I wanted to learn the Scriptures in the original Greek and I began to realise that what I believed didn’t match up with what the Scriptures actually taught.

A BIG RETHINK

EN: “For instance?”

MH: In 1 Corinthians it didn’t say we would be given spiritual gifts on demand, but as God wills. I had always been taught that, with enough faith, if you were ‘anointed’ and prayed enough, you would manifest the relevant gifts. I could see that God really didn’t work that way.

I could see that my fellow Bible students didn’t change for all their ‘anointing’. I witnessed the lack of basic integrity in fellow students and in my church. The church was in great debt and yet money was spent on unnecessary things like an electronic song board. We owed £200,000! And there were factions in the church. None of it added up. It didn’t fit at all with the health and wealth gospel we had been taught and which we preached. So I left.

EN: “And then?”

MH: Somebody gave me some videos teaching the Jewish exegetical method of learning. These methods would have been employed by the apostles. It really started to give me a much more critical mind. It caused me to ask more questions highlighting more and more areas that were very wrong. My faith started to re-focus again on Jesus and not the ‘outworkings’ such as praying in tongues or signs and wonders.

EN: “At this stage did you think of looking for an appropriate church?”

MH: Just before leaving I had already started the National Prayer Network evangelistic enterprise, producing teaching tapes and evangelistic videos. My energies went into that. Out of that came a group of people who started meeting together as a small church.

VERY DANGEROUS

EN: “What is your view about what is happening on the British church scene today?”

MH: We’re seeing an increase of Word Faith/health and wealth preaching and teaching. It is weakening the witness of the body of Christ by compromising to a world view. It gauges spirituality by success. The most dangerous thing is they are undermining true Christian faith which is based on God’s word alone. As Luther said, “My heart is captive to the word of God.”

EN: “What do you see as the hallmarks of this kind of ‘Christian’ belief?”

MH: Revelry, riotous behaviour, sensual Christianity.

EN: “And the more practical effects?”

MH: It re-directs funds away from legitimate gospel evangelism and real social needs, the orphans and widows and such. Its leaders earn exorbitant amounts of money – where the Bible teaches leaders shouldn’t reap dividends. If you can perform signs and wonders you can earn vast amounts of money. It was not unknown for me to be ‘gifted’ £400 – £500 on occasions. This is nothing to the five-figure sums charged by some modern prophets. Basic Christian truth is being superseded by pseudo-Christianity. We need to return to a Christ-centred gospel which produces a selfless and non-materialistic lifestyle.

EN: “What about the numbers the Faith and signs and wonders movement claim are saved?”

MH: This is self-deluding exaggeration based on faulty theology of conversion. They teach commitment to a message rather than conviction by the gospel. They need figures to validate their ministry for the continued solicitation of funds.

END-TIME ADVICE

EN: “What would you say then to those caught in the current signs and wonders movement?”

MH: Jesus did more signs and wonders than anybody else and at the end of His ministry He only had about 500 followers. Anyone caught up in the current trend towards belief in a great end-time restoration of the Church must first realise that this kind of revival is the opposite of what scripture promises. What Jesus did promise is the falling away of professing Christians, and an influx of false ‘anointed’ ones.

If we are truly living at the imminent return of Christ, where are those things that God promised must take place?

I would say to my brothers and sisters in these movements that you may well not be conscious that what you believe is other people’s opinion on Scripture, as I did. You would do well to heed the words of Martin Luther – ‘Sola Scriptura’.

Notes:

1.
Word-Faith preaches a gospel of personal wealth which can be obtained through the ‘force of faith’. Spiritual power is thus generated through ‘faith’. God’s sovereign will is effectively overridden by this ‘force of faith’, effecting eternal spiritual laws to which God Himself is subject. PG.

2.
Research carried out in 1994 amongst a number of Christians from many different backgrounds revealed that almost 100% believed the ‘Word-Faith’ message is merely the gospel plus healing and prosperity on demand. None of those surveyed had any idea of the depth of heresy and extent of error in this movement. (Extract from ‘The Faith Movement May Be Prospering But Is It Healthy?’, by Stuart St. John: 95 pence booklet available from Reachout Trust, 24 Ormond Road, Richmond, England).

The above article was first published by Evangelicals Now, March 1996, and is reprinted by kind permission.

http://www.christiandoctrine.net/doctrine/articles/article_00086_from_faith_in_faith_to_faith_in_christ_web.htm
Logged
JP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 161


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2010, 07:37:47 AM »

Thanks for all the posts.  I am still praying as well for God to give me better understanding.  I do disagree on one point that deagah mentioned.  Deagah - you said Mark 16 you believe was referring to the apostles.?  I don't see Jesus stating that what he is saying is only for the apostles he is speaking to.  Jesus is speaking to the apostles but he says "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation.  Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.  And these signs will accompany those who believe:  In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people and they will get well."

He is commanding them to go and make disciples and then lists what will accompany those that believe.

Why do you feel this is not speaking of what will accompany "ALL" who believe?  Are there other scriptures that expound on this?  Thanks.
Logged

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable - if anything is excellent or praiseworthy - think about such things.
deagah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 235



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2010, 09:44:58 AM »

Thanks for all the posts.  I am still praying as well for God to give me better understanding.  I do disagree on one point that deagah mentioned.  Deagah - you said Mark 16 you believe was referring to the apostles.?  I don't see Jesus stating that what he is saying is only for the apostles he is speaking to.  Jesus is speaking to the apostles but he says "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation.  Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.  And these signs will accompany those who believe:  In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people and they will get well."

He is commanding them to go and make disciples and then lists what will accompany those that believe.

Why do you feel this is not speaking of what will accompany "ALL" who believe?  Are there other scriptures that expound on this?  Thanks.

hey JP,

I believe it is for the apostles because verse 14  Jesus is speaking to the apostles and in verse 20 he tells us the apostles “went forth” and  that“signs” followed. And if that isn’t the case then to be consistent we need to apply snake bit and drinking poison too.  Look at 2 Cor 12:12 and then look at Acts2:43, 3:1-8, 4:33, 5:12-16, 9:36-43, 19:10, 28:8-9 and you will see it totally supports this.

I have a commentary that shows the signs were gone through out the Church history except for a few fringe heretical groups and I believe it is no different today. Anyway I'll type some of the comments later in case anyone is interested.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 10:59:36 AM by deagah » Logged
iwanthetruth
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 237



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2010, 12:44:26 PM »

Thought you might find this of interest. This is from a man that I know that upheld the idea of tongue speaking and after much study this was the conclusion he came to...

Quote
Hi All,

To be honest I meant to post something along these lines quite some time ago, but have only just been reminded of it as I came across an old post on this forum. It is my stance concerning the speaking of tongues, and how I think it only fair to publicly acknowledge a decision I have made concerning this. It's possible to read that which was my stance previously here: http://unitedinjesus.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=246.0

As we have been spending much time in our fellowship, attempting to get to a sound fundamental knowledge of the Scriptures, and an intimate relationship with the Lord through His Word, many of my previously accepted practices have been challenged. This is so with regard to my praying in tongues as spoken of in the post linked to above, and is a decision I have freely made of my own accord, and using simple reason and understanding.

I have been advocating strongly the practice of renewing our mind through the knowledge of His Word, as the means by which as Christians, we train our minds to serve the Law of Christ, and in so doing, drive down the desires of our flesh. This practice leaves no room for uncertainty in ones mind, but only undiluted acceptance of that which the Word of God clearly teaches, and a determination to surrender ones life obediently to that teaching.

With regard to my previous practice of praying at times in this unknown language, I have chosen to instead only pray with both the Spirit and understanding, for without the understanding, I cannot truly know without doubt that which I have prayed for is sincere. Simple logic I know, but it's taken quite some time to sink in.  I have also prayed that the Lord would forgive me if in this I am casting aside His gift to me, but it has been some time now since making this decision, and in no way at all do I have any sense in mind or spirit that the Lord is rebuking me for this decision.

I must point out that my decision in this is not intended to accuse anyone else, for I am still not clear about many things concerning the manifestation of the Holy Spirit. But as someone finding themself in a place of responsiblity for the instruction of other believers according to the Bible, I must ensure that everything that is unclear, and possibly misleading, is removed from the practices in my own life. This is obviously going to be an ongoing practice, and I do not intend to announce each time I repent of old ways, but in this case I have felt it necessary due to the way in which I have previously defended this practice.

God bless,
Logged

Tim
Bless the Lord all my Soul and all that is within me, bless His Holy Name!
Jamadan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 40



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2010, 03:55:24 PM »

JP,

It's not a good idea to post a question about tongues to a group of anti-charismatics who don't understand or respect the gifts of the Spirit.

Tongues can be a message to the Body, which of course must be interpreted.   But someone quietly praying in tongues to themselves is perfectly acceptable.  Ask yourself this question, if the couple were from Germany and they were quietly praying in German, would anyone object?  Of course not.  No difference.  When they are praying in tongues, Scripture says we are praying God's perfect will for whatever situation, especially since many times we don't even know how we ought to pray. 

As for not offending anyone, some people are just too easily offended and need to stop yielding to a judgemental/religious spirit that condemns anything they don't understand or haven't experienced themselves.  Jealousy masking itself as offense.  What if someone were to speak a prophecy?  Would these same people be offended?  Very likely, which means they are offended at the Holy Spirit and that's their problem.  Trying to stop this couple would be quenching the Spirit and Scripture commands us not to do that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!